You cannot pause a recording camcorder. The reason being, a pause button would damage the internal record elements in your camcorder. They put a start record button, the same button you press to stop recording.
Press the button again to start recording again. That is why they created Non Linear Editing (NLE) programs like windows movie maker and the many other video NLE programs that exist. You use those types of program to reassemble your shots and video clips, add effect, titles and more.
I own 3 Canon ZR model MiniDV camcorders. I use Pinnacle Studio 14 HD Ultimate as my NLE program. I have shot many multiple tape events.
I then have assembled the footage on the tapes as a movie. Easy to do, depends on the NLE you get, some have easy learning curves, some are not easy at all, in fact quite complicated. But there is no way to pause, only start recording, stop recording, start recording, stop recording and so on.
Have Fun.
· Suggested Reading
why i cann't download the ti-nspire cx student software ?
We understand you are having issues downloading the TI-Nspire CX Student Software.
We have verified that the web link you have listed works and were able to download the complete file so I we are unsure of why you are having issues downloading the software. Some suggestions we can offer you is to first try a different web browser then the one you are currently using. If you are connected to a wireless network connection try using a wired network connection to download the file.
If you are downloading the file from a managed network such as a school or workplace verify with the network administrator if they have placed a network download restriction preventing you from completing the download. If you are using a web browser that supports plugins you can look for a download manager that supports resuming downloads after they have failed. If you continue to have issues after trying the troubleshooting steps above we suggest contacting the support line at 1-800-842-2737 to order a CD to be mailed to you.
------
Find the general solution of ax b cx d (where a, b, c, and d are constants)?
in basic terms greater beneficial physics jargon . i'm now not even helpful if it quite is actual anymore .
Photons and gluons are strictly massless. they're the gauge fields of unbroken symmetries (in assessment to the susceptible vector bosons). through stable stress and the self-interactions of the gluons (the forged stress originates from a non-Abelian team -- so there is self interaction between the gauge fields -- the gauge fields themselves are charged), there may well be gluon condensation and the condensation seems vast.
As they're massless, they do now not at as rapidly as artwork alongside with Higgs boson on the tree-factor. At larger-loop ranges, there are interactions because of fact you're able to have all sorts of digital debris (i.e.
debris that are certainly not 'on-shell'). an comparable probable is going for the interactions with gravitons (the particle interpretation of the gravitational field). Photons curve around great our bodies.
Photons can now not ruin out black holes as rapidly as they're indoors the variety horizon of the black holes. besides the uncomplicated actuality that, those 2 subject concerns are particularly autonomous, different than the curvature of the photon trajectory is introduced approximately via potential of the black hollow
------
How to factor ax^3bx^2cxd?
All the methods to do this by hand are long (unless you have special cases for a, b, c and d) one way is to rewrite it in factor form, by pretending that the three roots are x1 x2 and x3 (fixed values, not variables).
ax^3bx^2cxd a(x-x1)(x-x2)(x-x3) You need four intermediate values, normally called q, r, s and t. q (3ac - b^2)/9a^2 r (9abc -27da^2 - 2b^3)/54a^3 s Cube root of r SQRT(q^3 r^2) t Cube root of r - SQRT(q^3 r^2) Once you have all that, you can find the roots: x1 s t - b/3a x2 (-1/2)(st) - b/3a (3/2)(s - t)i x3 (-1/2)(st) - b/3a - (3/2)(s - t)i --- There is also a method called Cardano's method, even longer (it involves getting rid of the second degree term, then going to a method by Thomas Harriot to solve the resulting equation). ----- In real numbers, you know that there will be at least one root.
Eventually, as x grows without bound towards inf., the value of the equation will be positive. As x gets more and more negative, the value of the equation must be negative at some point.
Therefore, between the two, the equation must be at zero.N '
------
how do you solve sin(axb)sin(cxd)?
This is kind of silly.
You have four degrees of freedom. You can express one parameter, either a, b, c, d, or x, in terms of the others. But there are an uncountable infinitude of answers.
cos() sin(/2 - ), so your equation is sin(ax b) sin(/2 - cx - d). Using the 2-periodicity of the sine function, all you can say is ax b /2 - cx - d 2n, where n is any integer. This produces (ac)x (b d) (4n1)/2.
If a - c anything, then all solutions are of the form b (4n1)/2 - d, for every integer n and every real number d. Otherwise, the solutions are x -(b d)/(a c) (4n1)/(2a2c) where a, b, c, and d are any real numbers such that a -c and n is any integer. That's it.
Those two cases are all there is (you can substitute "complex number" in for "real number" where it appears.)
------
If f(x)ax^(3)bx^(2)cx, find a,b,c?
The point (1, 2) is supposed to be on the graph.
So one condition on a, b, and c is f(1) 2 a(1^3) b(1) c(1) > a b c 2. The slope of the curve at (1, 2) is supposed to be -2. This gives another condition on a, b, and c.
f '(1) -2 3a(1) 2b(1) c > 3a 2b c -2. Finally, there is an inflection point at (1, 2); the second derivative will be zero. This is a third condition on the three unknowns.
f ''(1) 0 6a(1) 2b > 6a 2b 0. Now solve the linear system of equations a b c 2 3a 2b c -2 6a 2b 0. Subtract the first equation from the first to get 2a b -4 Multiply this by -2 and add to the third to isolate a.
6a 2b 0 -4a - 2b 8 --------------- 2a 8 > a 4. Sub into equation three, 6a 2b 0 > b -3a -3(4) -12. Then finally a b c 2 > c 2 - b - a 2 12 - 4 10.
That's it. Pulling it together gives f(x) 4x^3 - 12x 10x.
------
I'm thinking of trading my 2006 Acura RsX for a Mazda CX-7.
Good or bad idea?
Well, in terms of performance. RSX, TSX, Accord In terms of ride comfort.
Accord, TSX, RSX Really depends what you want, i own a RSX and was thinking about getting a TSX. but its really just a RSX with 4 doors. So i couldnt justify the extra costs for the same feel So then ask yourself.
. do you want 4 doors or 2. .
Personally, i would go with the TSX because it doesnt have 2nd gear grind issues like the RSX-S has (all years/models) - TSX has nice things like xeon lights, etc. I liked the Accord Coupe myself, and if i didnt want 4 doors, it would have been a serious option. But it doesnt handle as nice as your other two options.
. although it WILL be cheaper to maintain/repair RSX has the smallest rear seats of all your options. the rear seats doesnt fit anyone comfortably.
remember this (this is the reason im getting rid of it now) But all your options are pretty good. . you wont regret any of them.
------
92 honda civic cx (d15b8) short ram/cold air intake? 10 points?
Okay Brian, let me give you some advise.
I will tell you a few tricks to kind of fill in the gap for these such occasions. Civics are split up in generations, about 80% of all parts will fit all civics if they are in the same generation, the sub model, the CX, DX, LX, EX, SI. Ect and all the other various names civics have went under.
Now that being said, the different letters often mean different engines VARIATIONS. That's the kicker, most of the variants are similar, either compression or valve sizes or what ever make them different. With exception to the si, and the vtec engines.
But here is the trick. Go to any reputable parts site that offers comparison listing, like summitracing.com where the parts list all the parts it will fit.
Pick an intake, any intake if the part will fit all sub models, then their is about a 99% chance it will fit yours. That means that the engines all use common parts like intake manifold. So the intake's would be the same.
That goes for exhaust, intakes
------
Solve ax b cx for x.
For this, you want the equation to have X on its own on one side so: x etc First, you are going to want to get all x's to one side of the equals sign so you can -b from each side, and -cx from each side: ax b -b -cx cx - cx - b Simplify: ax -cx -b Now, to get x on its own, you need to factorise (ax -cx) which is simple enough because we can divide both by x to get a-c which we write as: x(a-c) -b Because x(a-c) x * a x * -c ax -ac So now that we only have one x, we need to remove (a-c), so to do that we must divide each side by (a-c): (Sorry if all the brackets make it look more confusing) x(a-c) /(a-c) -b /(a-c) Simplfyed to: X -b /(a-c) Hope that helps! Understanding the answer is more important than the answer itself so feel free to e-mail me if you don't understand anything I explained.
------
Solve it manually : ax^3bx^2cxd0 . How?
All the methods to do this by hand are long (unless you have special cases for a, b, c and d) one way is to rewrite it in factor form, by pretending that the three roots are x1 x2 and x3 (fixed values, not variables).
ax^3bx^2cxd a(x-x1)(x-x2)(x-x3) You need four intermediate values, normally called q, r, s and t. q (3ac - b^2)/9a^2 r (9abc -27da^2 - 2b^3)/54a^3 s Cube root of r SQRT(q^3 r^2) t Cube root of r - SQRT(q^3 r^2) Once you have all that, you can find the roots: x1 s t - b/3a x2 (-1/2)(st) - b/3a (3/2)(s - t)i x3 (-1/2)(st) - b/3a - (3/2)(s - t)i --- There is also a method called Cardano's method, even longer (it involves getting rid of the second degree term, then going to a method by Thomas Harriot to solve the resulting equation). ----- In real numbers, you know that there will be at least one root.
Eventually, as x grows without bound towards inf., the value of the equation will be positive. As x gets more and more negative, the value of the equation must be negative at some point.
Therefore, between the two, the equation must be at zero.