Is It a Bad Idea to Choose GraphQL for a React Blog Applications?

GraphQL is new. GraphQL is cool. Look!

Github dumped REST for it! We MUST do it too!nWell, why not.

GraphQL could be a great tool, but like any tool, you donu2019t choose it just because. You choose it because it solves a problem in a given context. You choose it knowing its strengths and weaknesses.

Learn GraphQL here: Learn GraphQL - Best GraphQL tutorials | Hackr.ioWhile discovering what is GraphQL we will see what REST API providers should think about before blindly dumping REST for it. From design and implementation to pricing model and analytics down to developers experience and implementations, choosing an API design style will have impact on the whole API lifecycle.

Therefore, this choice must be an enligthned one and not based on simple beliefs.Informed choiceBefore talking about GraphQL, I would like to ask you two really important questions. The first one is:Metallica or Iron Maiden.

Who is the best heavy metal band?Iron Maiden of course. You may disagre, that is your absolute right.

Metallica could also the best metal bandu2026 For you. The answer to this question is only a matter of personnal feelings.The second question is:Hammer or screwdriver.

Which is the best tool?Itu2019s a pretty dumb question isnu2019t it? The only possible answer to this question is it depends.

nIt depends on the tools capabilities and the context (what you want to do, what is your environnement, your budget, your objective).Without context, my hammer cannot be better than your screwdriver. Acting as a fanboy may be acceptable when it comes to choose your favorite heavy metal band.

But itu2019s definitely not a good idea when it comes to choose a tool, a product or an API styleu2026 From design and implementation to pricing model and analytics down to developers experience and backend implementations, choosing an API design style will have impact on the whole API lifecycle.So before blindly yelling u2026and GraphQL for all! just because Facebook created it and Github decided to use it, remember that GraphQL, just like REST, is only a tool.

A tool that you choose with a purpose within a certain context.Is it a bad idea to choose GraphQL for a react blog applications?

· Related Questions

How much ammo could a T-34 tank carry when fully loaded?

The question is fluid because lots of tricks could be played to carry more ammo. The T-34 was a very crowded tank with a cramped interior but like the Germans, additional shells could be carried in the laps of the crew or elsewhere at great risk if the motivation was right. Many German tanks, with a capacity of 60 - 80 rounds routinely found space for up to 120 rounds.

The T-34 carried up to 2700 rounds for its two 7.62 cal machine guns and a nominal 77 rounds of various kinds of ammunition for the main gun, including HE and AP. Nine rounds were considered u201creadyu201d ammo and were in a special quick-access rack beside the gun with the remainder were carried in covered compartments in the floor below the gun.

This was a drawback with the T-34 in combat because after the ready ammunition was fired, it took time consuming and significant effort to open the compartments and access the ammunition. The T-34 was always considered a slow-firing tank because of this and the multiple roles required of the commander and lack of a ubiquitous radio. The T-34 had a range of about 360 km at roughly 30 MPH but could hit a higher speed.

As the war wound on, the amount of armor and weight increased without changes to the engine so engine life and speed as well as range decreased. This was of minimal detriment u2014 the life span of a T-34 in combat was measured in weeks or a few months at most. The most prolific tank ever made with about 84,000 copies delivered at an increasingly reduced price every year, the Germans destroyed more than half of all T-34s made by the end of the war with the Sturmgeseutz 3 destroying 20,000 alone.

The inexpensiveness combined with the large numbers made resulted in a very valuable weapon for which there were always spare parts. u201cQuantity has a quality all its ownu201d was the watchword for the Soviets and every major drive included an often suicidal T-34 attack. No matter how many tanks the Germans destroyed there would always be more u2014 the Germans rarely attacked T-34 production facilities, they just didnu2019t have the air force to carry out the mission, to their detriment.

How much ammo could a T-34 tank carry when fully loaded?

------

Why werenu2019t revolver type cylinders more widely used on military rifles?

Because of this:The revolver design requires clearance between the cylinder and the barrel, known as the u201ccylinder gapu201d.

This gap is made as small as possible, but it simply cannot be a tight fit (and even if it is, it wonu2019t be so for long, as mechanical wear will widen the gap).When a bullet is fired, high-pressure gases escape out of that gap:This jet of high-pressure, high-temperature gas is like a cutting torch; people holding a revolver as shown in the above image have been known to lose thumbs. Now, youu2019re going to stick your forearm out along a rifle-size revolver to grab the foregrip.

Yeah, Iu2019ll pass on that, thanks.That gap creates a second problem; pretty much from the moment the bullet exits the cylinder, youu2019re losing gas pressure. That means a longer barrel, built to contain the pressure and increase the acceleration and thus the muzzle energy of the bullet, will actually fairly quickly decrease muzzle energy, as the friction of the bullet along the rifling overcomes the rapidly diminishing force of the gas pressure behind the bullet.

So, the much larger and heavier rifle actually wonu2019t get you proportionally more muzzle energy. The only real advantage of the longer length is more accurate sighting.And lastly, when the revolver was the most common repeating-action weapon before the advent of cartridge ammunition, revolvers often had a nasty habit of setting off more than one charge hole at a time.

The ultimate solution was the brass-cased cartridge and eventually smokeless powder, allowing a relatively even-grained fast-burning powder to be contained within the cartridge, reducing flying sparks. But at the time when revolvers were cutting edge, this was a real problem, and it gave you a second, really good reason not to want a hand in front of the cylinder. By the time the ammunition problems were satisfactorily solved just after American Reconstruction (the American Civil War being the last one the country fought primarily with muzzle-loaders), the lever-action carbine was in fairly wide use, followed by the rotating-lock mechanism that enabled bolt-action and ultimately semi-automatic rifle operating mechanisms with cartridge energies beyond the capabilities of the basic revolver design.

Why werenu2019t revolver type cylinders more widely used on military rifles?Why werenu00b4t revolver type cylinders more widely used on military rifles?

------

What's the best way or where to find remote jobs for Java developers?

Java remains one of the most popular programming languages. In our recent deep-dive into the hottest programming languages, Java landed second among the most-used programming languages and the languages with the most active repositories on GitHub u2013 beat out only by JavaScript in both categories.Aside from its widespread use, itu2019s also the most in-demand programming language among employers, with more job listings seeking developers with Java skills than any other language.

So naturally, if youu2019re one of the employers behind the 36,000 job listings seeking Java developers or youu2019re a Java programmer looking for your next gig, the skills and characteristics that set great Java developers apart from the pack is crucial information.u201cI have been trying to put together a list of basic skills a Java developer should have to move on to being an advanced Core Java programmer and get there remote worku2026u201dSkills Required -You;can write code on paper which has a good chance of compiling.can use a debugger to debug programs and profile an application.

are familiar all the primitives types and operators in Java.understand the class loading process and how class loaders work.can use multiple threads both correctly and can prove this improves performance or behavior (e.

g. , wait/notify/notifyAll, SwingUtils. invokeLater, the concurrency library)can use checked exceptions, generics and enums.

can time a small benchmark and get reproducible results.can write a very simple client-server TCP service. have an understanding of garbage collection, when is it triggered, what can you do to minimize it.

understand when to use design patterns such as Singleton, Factory, Fly-weight, Builder, Object Pool, Iterator, Strategy, Visitor, Composite.Hope you got my points begin a Java developers and it would help you to get your remote jobs. Come to your next question where to find remote jobs for Java developers after getting these skills you can go with many online platform like MyRemoteTeam, Remoteok, Glassdoor, Working Nomads and many more in this list for full-time remote jobs.

I suggest you MyRemoteTeam - recently launched a tech startup. MyRemoteTeam is a quick & easy way for Businesses to Pay Remote Teams, Employees, Consultants & Freelancers. Hope it helps you to get your remote jobs.

ThanksWhat's the best way or where to find remote jobs for Java developers?

------

Why have there any 75/76/77mm round that have even longer bullet/casing than the Sherman Firefly or the Panther's ammo? Has something such like that been ever designed/used?

Why? Why not?

Many anti-armor rounds of that era were kinetic energy killers.

That is, their delivered energy was a function of 1/2 times projectile mass times the square of the velocity. To get more energy on the target you can either increase the mass of the projectile or increase the velocity. Increasing velocity depends on the gunu2019s ability to rapidly expand burning propellant gases as the projectile progresses down the bore.

Gas dynamics are a limiting factor as the bore reaches the limit of how rapidly gas can travel down the barrel. Increases beyond that require higher pressures, which in turn require stronger gun tubes. The heyday of the 75mm guns was in the 1940u2019s and 1950u2019s, after which few advances were made.

Emphasis switched to larger muzzle diameters, which yielded a larger u201cpiston areau201d on the base of the projectile against which muzzle gasses could push, and thereby eased the gas flow problems. Larger projectiles could also carry more massive penetrators, so both terms in the kinetic energy expression were improved. To imagine how this effect works, letu2019s take an example to extremes.

Imagine a tank gun cartridge which has 100 kg of propellant, but only a 9mm bore (like a handgun). What happens when you fire it? All that burning propellant cannot expand down the tube quickly enough, so it either blows up the gun or it accelerates the projectile to a certain high speed, after which the remainder of the propellant gases are wasted in a spectacular muzzle flash.

Nobody bothered to develop 75mm class weapons beyond WWII, because it was more practical to go to larger bores, such as the Russian 85mm and 100mm and the US 90mm. By the 1960u2019s tank guns in 105mm, 115mm, and even larger were appearing.As another responder has noted, beyond a certain size the cartridge becomes unwieldy, and difficult for a human loader to handle easily.

The Russians met this with two-piece ammunition handled by a mechanical loader, and the British used a human loader to attempt the same thing. In both cases, the two-piece ammunition requires two separate actions during loading, which slows down firing.Why have there any 75/76/77mm round that have even longer bullet/casing than the Sherman Firefly or the Panther's ammo?

Has something such like that been ever designed/used? Why? Why not?

.