What Are Some Great B2b Marketing Video Creation Tools?

Since youre looking to make B2B marketing videos youll need a tool that time efficient, easy to use and most importantly a tool that lets you do more across social media platforms. While there are a couple of options listed already, Im going to ahead and talk about the tool I use, just in case it fits your requirements better.I started out creating creative text videos for my brand and hence Typito seemed like great choice.

While it specializes in motion graphic text videos it isnt limited to just that, theres a whole lot more to it.Heres why I find the tool compatible for B2B marketing video creation:Easy work-flow and Time efficientWorking in such a quick paced line, I couldnt afford to spare time with sophisticated software, here where online tools really helped me. Typitos one click motion graphic text templates are customizable to the extent that you can match it with your brand colours to make it look like it was created for your brand.

This also lets you maintain uniformity of brand identity. Whether its stylized motion graphic titles, lower third, captions, and social media tags they have text templates for all. Since you mentioned B2B marketing videos, you might like the social media call-to-action templates; theyre great for B2B marketing videos.

Heres how the text templates workSourced from - Typitos Library on GiphyBranding BusinessFor great B2B videos need branding is something else you might want to consider. Branding on videos is key to helping your video stand out. Their branded templates lets you blend images/logos and text that is decently customizable.

Sourced from - Typitos Library on GiphyThe videos you export from Typito are all in HD so theres no question of video quality, and you can share it across Social media platforms directly from the tool after exporting.You can save templates you've created so if you want to reuse them for future projects itll show up under the saved tab, and save you the effort of recreating it for any series of videos you might want to use it for in the future.The tool offers a feature called Brand Kit which is great for working to ensure that the videos that are published are brand-compliant.

This basically lets me upload a specific brand font and other language fonts making my videos accessible across other languages as well. In addition to this I can add colors that make up my brand's color palette. This can be saved so that it's easily for later videos.

Team CollaborationTypito supports a workspace that allows you to add team members. You can even have designated roles for each member like owner, producer and editor which smoothens the work process.So these are some of the reasons why Typito stands out for me.

I would recommend trying out a demo to see if it suits what youre looking for. They have reasonably priced plans under Plus, Business, Agency that have monthly and annual subscriptionsHope this suggestion was useful :)

· Related Questions

Could Britain possibly have defeated Germany during World War Two had the U.S.

and Soviet Union both remained neutral?

This is a much more difficult to answer than it might first appear. And those that base their response simply on what happened to the British Army in 1940 have not considered enough factors.

The fact is that Germany was set for short war. Germany did not have the economic means to wage war for an extended period without getting them from elsewhere. This means invading other countries because they arent going to be shipped into Germany anytime soon through the British blockade.

Hence the final gamble of invading the Soviet Union. Germany was critically short of particular materials required for their military, as well as, perhaps most importantly, enough oil. This means that you can quote as much wonder-weapons as you like, but they arent going to be as effective without certain strategic materials.

Also, the bounty gained by defeating France, the Low Countries, Norway etc was soon exhausted and if anything they became an additional burden on the German economy. This is moreso if Italy becomes an ally. So as long as Germany cant defeat Britain - and countless Quora answers will explain why not - the German economy is going to fall apart eventually.

And this is without the British strategic bombing campaign, which is going to accelerate the issue. Yes you can have the most powerful army in the world, but unless you can properly equip it and use it, its not as effective as it seems on paper. In Britains case this means also getting it across the English Channel, established on shore, and keeping it supplied (this last part being often forgotten).

Germany was incapable of any of this, and to create the required conditions (bigger combat navy to fight the RN, bigger logistics navy to transport the forces and carry the massive amount of supplies, bigger airforce to achieve air superiority to do everything else), would be somewhere between impossible, and taking so much time that the economy would implode first. And dont forget the vast bulk of the German army is fairly immobile infantry divisions, lacking motor transport. This is in stark contrast to the fully motorised British Army - particularly in a war where mobility is vital.

All this is the opposite with Britain. The longer the war goes on the stronger it gets. Britain has the German codes and intercepts, has the potential to build the A-bomb before Germany, and, perhaps most importantly, can draw upon the resources and manpower of the the commonwealth.

Certainly the British Army is defeated in 1940 - but its relatively tiny and not really directly engaged. It also loses a few times after that. But it learns and improves and grows, and utilises technology and firepower to achieve parity with the German army - in the places it chooses to engage.

So Britain defeating Germany is possible, because Britain has the time and resources to do it eventually. For Germany there is only a certain time available, and since it cant defeat Britain in that timescale, it must ultimately lose. It is also worth reading books such as James Hollands The War in the West that describe how poorly prepared and suited Germany was for an extended war, making those Quora questions about whether they could win the war after (whatever) date quite pointless

------

What was positive about the Crusades?

Sometimes, you fight a battle in a foreign land, so that you dont have to fight one on your land. The Crusades took the battle of Islam to the middle east, but if they had not, the battle would have been before the gates of Vienna or Florence, and the Crusades gave Europe time to prepare for the Islamic invasion. So what was positive was that the crusades bought time for Christianity to be prepared for the cultural clash that came later.

It was successful, and to date, Islam has been stopped and limited to the 40 or so countries found in the 1040 window (Latitudes 10 north and 40 south). The Crusades gave us time.Secondly, while we learned principles of warfare, modern money and banking originated during the Crusades.

Money deposited with the Templers in one spot would be available in another, merely on presenting a marque. Like checking, its a concept born out of the Crusades, and we rely on it to this day. We also developed modern military tactics and it gave monarchs new power and trade routes.

New foods, new materials, and even the concept of income taxes grew out of the Crusades. There were negatives. The First Crusade was the only crusade that was truly successful from a military viewpoint; lots of people died on both sides over 200 years, and disease became a battlefield of its own.

True, we learned how to do surgery, and imported the concept of hospitals from Islam. It also set up a long-standing military opposition between Islam and Christianity that persists to this day, largely because of militants in both camps who wish to eliminate the threats posed by a rival ideology, rather than finding a modus vivendi. Most people forget that the Crusades were to protect the Christians and Christian sites in the Holy Land, and to halt the oppression of Islam from encroaching on Christian Europe.

Faced with an implacable foe who relentlessly opposed and oppressed Christians, the Crusades sought to take the fight to their turf before they brought it to ours. Its a fair tactic: Put the pointy end of the spear, and the hardened shaft, into the heart of the opponents land rather than let him bring the fight to your land. Today, jihadis are taking their fight to Europe and America in the hopes of winning a cultural battle and taking control.

They desire to subvert, oppress, and marginalize a culture that is arguably superior in almost every way, and to do it at the point of a gun or by terrorist means. The job of the Christian opposition is to marginalize such acts, and make them costly, and to show them as a failure. Its a long conflict, and because its still a salient issue, I suspect we will be battling between cultures for years to come, unless there is a final decisive war.

If Islam is a superior civilization, it should be able to show it by advances in science. It should be able to show it by incredible economic success. It should be able to do it through acts of charity and humanity.

It should be able to win the hearts and minds of people, not through acts of terror, but through acts of kindness and charity. Its challenge to do so speaks to me of the challenge facing Islam today, which is to grow as a civilization out of its roots in 7th Century Arabia and into a modern world.