Industrial cluster cluster development, "a nuclear area" industry cluster initially formed. The province's LED industry has been basically formed from the substrate materials, epitaxial wafers, chips, packaging to the application of a complete industrial chain, the province has more than 16,000 LED enterprises, more than 4,000 enterprises on regulations, driving related employment nearly 300 million people. Among them, the province's LED listed companies have 31, of which the main business of LED listed 17 companies, accounting for the country's main business to LED 68% of the listed companies; LED business involving the province's 14 listed companies, accounting for 50% of the country involved in the LED market, the province's total market value of 31 listed companies LED over 115 billion yuan. To the backbone enterprises as the basis, Guangdong LED industry base has taken shape "1 5" pattern of development, that is, Shenzhen national LED industry base as a leader, Huizhou, Dongguan, Jiangmen, Foshan, Guangzhou, 5 provincial LED industry base As the support of the "one nuclear area" industrial clusters.
To athiests, the development of human life?
Yup, you are suffering from the delusion that God set up everything to match its function, when in fact the function ends up matching the structure. In his book Candide, Voltaire gave the example of an eternal optimist named Pangloss. Among other things, Pangloss believed that noses were shaped so that spectacles could fit them, and legs were designed to fit britches (instead of the other way around). The fetus just happens to make the best of its situation in the womb, God does nothing to make it more comfortable. As human heads got larger to accommodate a larger brain (to give us the intellingence that has proven so important to the survival of the species), women's pelvis' and birth canal grew wider. This, however, made walking or other forms of bipedal locomotion more difficult. As you can see, not everything was perfectly mapped out by God, efficiency at one thing (giving birth to children with large heads) gave rise to inefficiency in another (locomotion and balance). Also, women with narrower pelvis and birth canals will give birth to babies with smaller heads, or, if a baby with a large head is delivered, it will be deprived of oxygen during the process of parturition (giving birth). This would adversely affect early childhood development of the brain and produce less intelligent children. Such children will have a smaller chance of survival to reproductive age. Thus, over hundreds of thousands of years, the descendants of women with narrow birth canals would fail to pass on their genes. This is how it came to the situation today where women have wider pelvises than men, and women from eons ago. Thus, what we see today is only a snapshot of evolution and natural selection. Far from being immediately designed by God to be fully functional organisms, humans have had to evolve, shedding characteristics unsuited to life on Earth. There is nothing inherently beautiful in the design of the female reproductive system today; it just happens to be the best of many alternatives.
Please read this article and argue your side. I have no opinion. Please help to clarify this confusing matter!?
Interesting article. But it has holes. The US does not pay 17% in GDP it is only 5%. The US military that protects these other countries allowing them to put that money back into these health care systems. The US is the leader in development of cures and procedures for diseases and illnesses. If you are not profitable in medicine you will not have the funds to research new drugs and procedures to combat new illnesses. How much does it cost for a company to research a new drug to treat AIDS or Swine flu? The biggest problem in the US is preventative procedures. If you were to change the diet of the average American you would see the US leap beyond every country in the world. Our eating habits are the only reason we are behind in any category
What type of project can be done under Mathematical modeling in M.Sc. Bio resources management?
All kinds of good stuff! Nutrient uptake and/or water storage capacity of wetlands (i.e, impact studies of development or restoration), population dynamics of food species in subtidal waters, effects of perturbation of food sources in commercially valuable species, cascade effects of 'fishing down' the food chain, impact of conservation or exploitation of apex predators on forage species (and vice versa)... hopefully you get the idea. Do not forget about using economic modeling to predict resource harvest and production pressures, too. Exploiting resources is about the money, and the money can be used to track and analyze exploitation, too.