Why Was the Technology of the Native Americans so Much Less Advanced Than That of the Europeans When

At the time European explorers arrived, Native American Indians were at a Stone Age level in technology. They also had no real concepts of individual land ownership and instead believed that land belonged to everyone.Add in the lack of any core academic knowledge to support basic technologies such as working metals, glass-making, large scale farming, permanent shelter construction and it is easy to see that these huge disadvantages Native American Indians had worked overwhelmingly in the favor of those fleeing tyrant-based, European class-restricted, serfdom based cultures where any real concept of Freedom along with the right to worship as one wanted and to be able to defend themselves from tyrants and dictators were dreams to be crushed by the European Royalty Establishment.

• Related Questions

Is Mueller completely walking away from the Trump investigation?

I would hardly say that finishing a job and giving a statement about the job you did, then waiting for the proper authorities to do something with the job that you did could be considered walking away. He investigated thoroughly, he made his report, he said a few things about his report, and now, he is moving on. The one thing that was made most clear from his statement is that he does not think that Trump is innocent or exonerated . He very clearly states that the current department of justice says that a sitting president cannot be criminally indicted. Which tells me that he thinks that Trump is anything but innocent or exonerated. The only reason Trump is not in a jail cell right now is because his department of justice is protecting him. He needs to be impeached so he can be prosecuted

------

What can I say instead of "I don't know" in an interview?

"I am not sure I quite know the answer yet, but let me try and attempt it", in case you at least have a clue about the answer"Well, I am sorry I do not know the answer but I would be glad if you could tell me", if you absolutely have no idea about the answer"I am sorry to say I would not be able to answer that because that is not under my area of expertise/not something I have worked on or dealt with" could be an alternate if you do not know anything about the answer"To be honest, I do not know the answer at the moment but I would gladly learn it soon" if you do not know the answer and want to sound like an enthusiastic person

------

Will the USA have a chance of winning if it goes to war against China in the South China Sea?

I assume that the war in SCS would be a naval engagement and not land invasion. China does not have resources or capacity to invade all ASEAN countries.Do you see the situation ? It is a clear advantage for US. In any engagement in SCS, China must send aircrafts and warships from their bases that are at least 2500 km away. That's a huge logistic nightmare. The tiny bases they have in those islands would be a shooting practice targets for short range missiles of US military bases.The strategists of Pentagon was really have a long term point of view when they built all the bases in Thailand, Philipine and Singapore long before CPC was starting to build up their navy. It was a very good move.

If there is any engagement in SCS that China hopes to win, it must be a land invasion to Laos and Vietnam

------

What do "other Arabs" think about the Gulf Arabs?

As a north africanI dont like themBecause they are the reason that the entire middleeast is in hellNot to mention thanks to them for extremism because they are the people who spread their wahabi false islamic ideology not only to the middleeast but worldwide and they are the same people that ruined other middleeastern countries as wellAnd they are the reason that world sees Muslims and rest of the supposed arabs combined the way they do todayI wouldnt wish for anything else rather than north african countries cut ties with them because they are toxic to us and to themselves and to the rest of the world worldAnd i exclude iraq from them , because its a victim of their work as well

------

Which US Supreme Court decisions have been generally recognized as being poor legal decisions?

Dred Scott v Sandford, Plessy v Ferguson, Korematsu v US, Roe v Wade, Wickard v. Filburn, Lochner v. NY, Kelo v New London, Chevron USA v. NRDC, Obergefell, Buck v. Bell, Civil Rights Cases, Exxon Shipping Co. v. Baker, Slaughter-House Cases, Smith v. Maryland, Harlow v. Fitzgerald, Bennis v. Michigan, Gonzales v. Raich, Helvering v. Davis, Buckley v. Valeo, NFIB v. Sebelius,

The Supreme Court's Worst Decisions of All Time

The 5 Worst Supreme Court Rulings of the Past 50 Years

15 Supreme Court Decisions that Shredded the Constitution | Sean J. Rosenthal

The Ten Worst Supreme Court Decisions (at least so far)

Ranking the 10 Worst Supreme Court Decisions of All-Time

13 Worst Supreme Court Decisions of All TimeIll try to spend some time fleshing out my reasoning. These are just the ones that immediately spring to mind - I was challenged to name a single Supreme Court case that obviously violated/abrogated the Constitution.

------

How is it that the Beatles are ranked above a band like Led Zeppelin when they were much more talented?

Talent has nothing to do with it.Nor should it.The Beatles were the forefront of a revolution in music. Their albums were more approachable and had wider appeal in their early years, and were more advanced, ambitious, and better produced in their later years.While Led Zeppelin was incredibly talented (Good times Bad Times is a shot across the bow talent-wise of Supergroups like Cream and The Jimi Hendrix Experience).

However, even though Led Zeppelin was, on the whole, more musically talented than the Beatles, it didnt MEAN as much culturally and musically as the Beatles did.In the end, Led Zeppelin created iconic music of their own, but very few rounded music fans would readily say that and Led Zeppelin Album, even IV or Physical Graffiti, was as impactful as The White Album, or Sgt. Peppers

------

How did it feel watching Stephen Fry say that if God exists, he must be utterly evil?

Yawn.Every. single. time that I hear the same old, If God were good why would He give cancer to kids? or If God exists, then He must be evil, because etc. etc. ad nauseam.Look, the Philosophy of Religion is a real thing. The arguments for and against the existence of God are real philosophical arguments, some of which have entire books written about them.

This particular argument is known as the Problem of Evil, which was a very strong argument against the existence of God. The consensus among, even theistic, philosophers was that the Problem of Evil successfully made the existence of God illogical. Until, Alvin Plantinga, successfully refuted it with his Free Will Defense in the 1970s.

So if you dont know that, you are uneducated about the debate, and look like a boob if the Problem of Evil is your go to argument against God

------

What are your religious beliefs?

I am a ChristianMy BeliefsThere is only one God and Creator. His name is YAHWEH.YAHWEH exists as a Trinity: God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Spirit.Jesus is God the Son. He is fully God and fully man.Jesus was crucified for the sins of mankind and rose from the dead.

The Bible is the infallible and inerrant Word of God.The Bible is the ultimate authority when it comes to how a Christian should live his/her life.My Personal PreferencesI dont eat pork, shellfish or any of the other animals prohibited by God in the Old Testament.

I dont celebrate Halloween or watch horror movies.Im against getting tattoos and/or body piercings

------

Who's taller, Trump or Obama?

Donald Trump claims to be 6′3″, and Barack Obama has been confirmed to be 6′1″. However, in every picture of the two together, Obama has been about the same height as the incumbent POTUS, if not very slightly taller.Now, let's look at these pictures. Melania Trump is 5′11″, but I don't see a four-inch difference between her and her husband.

Similarly, Justin Trudeau is 6′2″...Mitt Romney is also 6′2″...And Jeb Bush is 6′3″, Trump's claimed height, and you can easily see that the former is taller than the POTUS.As you can clearly see, the idea of Donald Trump being taller than Barack Obama is plainly and demonstrably false

------

Can a married man love both his wife and another woman?

The simple answer to the question is No. Love is deeper than what most people take it to be, and assuming that we are talking about purely romantic love, there is no way a man can have this for two or more women. The same occurs for women too. Genuine romantic love full of affection and trust can only exist between two people. That extra woman's case is most likely a liking, lust, infatuation, crush or another thing in that line. If a man has sexual feelings towards another woman other than his wife and vise versa, that's not love. Those who are in polygamous relationships don't get into them because they love more women, but because there is something missing in their first marriages, or they siply have a high appetite for sex

------

Can we make the NOT gate by AND gate and OR gate?

Before going to the answer I just wanted to ask you why you need the conversion?Now come to the point, it is the smallest gate in the logic family comparing the transistorized circuit. Please check the circuit diagram for NOT AND OR gates from books/online sources for more clarification.As per my understanding we can't make NOT gate only using AND and OR gate.

If you want to implement the NOT gate logic by using these gates then you will need the extra circuit.The next point is that NOT AND and OR are basic gates not the universal gates.NAND NOR are the universal gates, using these two you can implement any logic.

If you want to make NOT from these two you can do it

------

Is the Impossible burger considered to be a healthier alternative to eating beef?

This plant-based burger has more protein, less total fat, no cholesterol, and fewer calories than a similar-sized hamburger patty made with beef. So in that respect, it is probably healthier. However, in my opinion, dont be fooled by the ads or vegetarian blogs: It does not really taste like meat! Its made with a protein called heme which is a molecule found in every living plant and animal. Its what gives meat its flavor. Heme in the Impossible burger is made via fermentation of genetically engineered yeast. To me it had a bit of metallic flavor and had an after taste that I didnt particularly care for. Still, the Impossible burger is developing quite a following and several restaurant chains which include Burger King, Wahlburgers and about 200 other restaurants nation wide are serving them.

------

What are "faithless electors" in the latest Supreme Court ruling?

Original Question: A faithless elector is one who betrays the voters of their state. The voters of a particular state make a choice for President. Electors are chosen to deliver that decision to Washington for the final tally. These electors are chosen with the faith that they will accurately represent the voters of their state.If the Electors choose to pick someone else they prefer, rather than the choice of the voters, that effectively disenfranchises millions of legitimate, good-faith votes cast by the people.Opponents of President Trump have been attempting to form an agreement between several states to nullify their own voters and instead have their electors go along with the national popular vote, largely dominated by California and New York. This would be vote disenfranchisement on a massive scale